Game-theoretic Models of the Political Influence of Interest by Randolph Sloof

By Randolph Sloof

In this bankruptcy the subject of this publication is brought. part 1. 1 offers a quick and relatively normal motivation for the clinical venture undertaken the following. curiosity teams are a truly renowned item of medical inquiry, and so they got already substantial study recognition from students in political technological know-how, in addition to from researchers in economics. unavoidably, then, this ebook provides to a literature that is already rather constructed. a close positioning during this literature of the theoretical fabric awarded during this monograph might be given in bankruptcy 2. This moment bankruptcy also will, by way of a evaluate of the empirical literature, offer a extra basic review of the problems deemed to be very important while learning the effect of curiosity teams on public coverage. the description of the full e-book is defined in higher element in part 1. 2. As so much matters concerned are extra simply provided in later chapters, this introductory bankruptcy is saved short. 1. 1 MOTIVATION monstrous political strength is frequently attributed to curiosity teams. Examples abound in either the economics and political technological know-how literature, in addition to in journalistic debts and renowned guides. On many events the authors show matters in regards to the adverse effect of curiosity teams at the democratic caliber of presidency. "The pursuits of a small staff are served on the rate of the pursuits of most people, the taxpayers!", is a regularly heard renowned complaint.

Show description

Read or Download Game-theoretic Models of the Political Influence of Interest Groups PDF

Similar elections books

Breaking the Deadlock: The 2000 Election, the Constitution, and the Courts

The 2000 Presidential election led to a collision of background, legislation, and the courts. It produced a impasse that dragged out the outcome for over a month, and consequences--real and imagined--that promise to pull on for years. within the first in-depth research of the election and its litigious aftermath, pass judgement on Posner surveys the background and thought of yankee electoral legislation and perform, analyzes which Presidential candidate ''really'' gained the preferred vote in Florida, surveys the litigation that ensued, evaluates the courts, the attorneys, and the commentators, and ends with a blueprint for reforming our Presidential electoral practices.

Passages to the Presidency: From Campaigning to Governing

Examines the careers of 4 presidents and explores the ways that the political procedure is altering their function.

Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition

This present day, electoral authoritarianism represents the most typical type of political regime within the constructing international - and the single we all know least approximately. Filling within the lacuna, this new booklet provides state of the art examine at the inner dynamics of electoral authoritarian regimes. every one concise, jargon-free bankruptcy addresses a selected empirical puzzle at the foundation of cautious cross-national comparability.

Armageddon: How Trump Can Beat Hillary

AT STAKE: the way forward for AMERICAThe 2016 election is really America's Armageddon—the final and decisive conflict to avoid wasting the United States, a struggle to defeat Hillary Clinton and the forces trying to flout our constitutional executive and exchange it with an omnipotent president subsidized up through an activist judiciary that solutions to nobody.

Extra info for Game-theoretic Models of the Political Influence of Interest Groups

Sample text

F. and A. Zardkoohi, 1988, Congressional support for unions' positions across diverse legislation, Journal of Labor Research 9, 149-165. McArthur, J. V. Marks, 1988, Constituent interest vs. legislator ideology: The role of political opportunity cost, Economic Inquiry 26, 461-470. McCarty, N. S. Rothenberg, 1996, Commitment and the campaign contribution contract, American Journal of Political Science 40, 872-904. McCormick, R. D. Tollison, 1981, Politicians, legislators and the economy. An inquiry into the interest group theory of government (Kluwer, Boston).

And U. Ben-Zion, 1975, Political contribution and policy-some extensions, Public Choice 19, 1-12. Ben-Zion, U. and Z. Eytan, 1974, On money, votes, and policy in a democratic society, Public Choice 17,1-10. , 1991, Rent-seeking and the behavior ofregulators: An empirical analysis, Public Choice 69, 51-67. G. R. Lott, 1997, Do campaign donations alter how a politician votes? , Journal of Law and Economics 40, 317-350. , 1992, Objectives and constraints of government policy: The countercyclity of transfers to agriculture, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, 617-629.

Beghin (1990), Boucher (1991), Cahan and Kaempfer (1992), Pincus (1975), Quinn and Shapiro (1991), Tigges and Clarke (1992), Trefler (1993). 33. , besides the studies cited in the examples, Abrams and Settle (1993), Boucher (1991), Globerman and Kadonaga (1994), Graddy (1991), Graddy and Nichol (1989), Guttman (1978), Kamath (1989), Plotnick (1986), and Stigler (1971). 34. , Abler (1991), Becker (1986), Boucher (1991), Graddy (1991), McCormick and Tollison (1981), Richardson and Munger (1990), Teske (1991), Young (1991).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.13 of 5 – based on 49 votes