Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing by Michel Balinski, Rida Laraki

By Michel Balinski, Rida Laraki

This is often a tremendous ebook destined to impress substantial controversy. encouraged by way of a deep knowing of perform -- score scholars, skaters, wines -- it is going past impossibility theorems to constructively problem the dominant method of the layout of vote casting tactics with a brand new idea, supported by means of vast experimental proof. Martin Shubik , Seymour Knox Professor Emeritus of Mathematical Institutional Economics, Yale college

Show description

Read Online or Download Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing PDF

Best elections books

Breaking the Deadlock: The 2000 Election, the Constitution, and the Courts

The 2000 Presidential election resulted in a collision of heritage, legislations, and the courts. It produced a impasse that dragged out the outcome for over a month, and consequences--real and imagined--that promise to pull on for years. within the first in-depth research of the election and its litigious aftermath, pass judgement on Posner surveys the historical past and conception of yank electoral legislations and perform, analyzes which Presidential candidate ''really'' gained the preferred vote in Florida, surveys the litigation that ensued, evaluates the courts, the attorneys, and the commentators, and ends with a blueprint for reforming our Presidential electoral practices.

Passages to the Presidency: From Campaigning to Governing

Examines the careers of 4 presidents and explores the ways that the political method is altering their function.

Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition

This day, electoral authoritarianism represents the most typical type of political regime within the constructing international - and the only we all know least approximately. Filling within the lacuna, this new e-book provides state-of-the-art examine at the inner dynamics of electoral authoritarian regimes. each one concise, jargon-free bankruptcy addresses a particular empirical puzzle at the foundation of cautious cross-national comparability.

Armageddon: How Trump Can Beat Hillary

AT STAKE: the way forward for AMERICAThe 2016 election is really America's Armageddon—the final and decisive conflict to avoid wasting the US, a struggle to defeat Hillary Clinton and the forces looking to flout our constitutional govt and change it with an omnipotent president sponsored up through an activist judiciary that solutions to not anyone.

Extra info for Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing

Sample text

7, show how well the method worked. C. F. would each have had two seats and the parties of the group one in total (last column). C. F. to one seat each and gave three to the group of parties. F. was thought to be popular in Paris and several of its more affluent suburbs. The architects of the law feared the electoral system just described would be a disadvantage in these departments. They found a simple expedient: 8. On April 21, 1944, a decree of Charles de Gaulle’s provisional government in Algiers established women’s suffrage.

Similarly, every one of Texas’s thirty-two districts has a population of 651,619 or 651,620. How is it possible to determine such “perfect” plans? The answer is simple. First, a fundamental advance in gerrymandering technology has been made; second, a municipality, township, or village is no longer necessarily within one district. The smallest “atom” that is never split is a census tract: the average number of inhabitants of a census tract in Pennsylvania was thirty-eight. Pennsylvania’s district plan splits twenty-nine counties and eighty-one municipalities.

Silvio Berlusconi’s government, facing upcoming elections in April 2006, completely changed the electoral law for electing the members of the Chamber of Deputies on December 14, 2005, a mere four months before the elections. It replaced a mixed system, known as the “Legge Mattarella” or “Mattarellum,” whereby 75% of the deputies were elected in single-member districts and 25% on a proportional basis, with a system that is supposedly proportional. 4c Mexican House of Deputies Election, July 6, 1997, showing the Biproportional Apportionment Region PRI PAN PRD PVEM PT Total I II III IV V 14 16 18 12 14 17 16 8 8 8 7 5 12 16 15 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 40 40 40 40 40 Total 74 57 55 8 6 200 Note: Boldface numbers indicate differences from the actual apportionment.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.36 of 5 – based on 4 votes