By Julia F. Lowell
Various U.S. kingdom and jurisdictional governments minimize their arts budgets in 2003 and 2004. the writer argues that the cause of those cuts is not only a one-time monetary predicament, however the political weak point of kingdom arts organizations that has arisen as a result of a starting to be mismatch among their roles and buildings and the cultural and political realities they face. A shift within the arts companies' concentration and investment could be a answer, however it can't occur until eventually very important conceptual and useful matters are resolved.
Read Online or Download State Arts Agencies in Search of Themselves, 1965-2003 PDF
Best history_1 books
Britain's dating with the Gulf quarter is still one of many few unexplored episodes within the learn of British decolonization. the choice, introduced in 1968, to go away the Gulf inside 3 years represented an particular reputation by means of Britain that its 'East of Suez' position was once at an finish. This booklet examines the decision-making technique which underpinned this reversal and considers the interplay among British decision-making, and native responses and tasks, in shaping the trendy Gulf.
History of Universities: Volume XXI 1
Quantity XXI/1 of historical past of Universities includes the wide-spread mixture of discovered articles, booklet reports, convention experiences, and bibliographical details, which makes this book such an quintessential device for the historian of upper schooling. Its contributions variety commonly geographically, chronologically, and in subject-matter.
- With Skilful Hand: The Story Of King David (Mcgill-Queen's Studies in the History of Religion 2.29)
- DIE UNIFORMEN DER PANZERTRUPPE und gepanzerten Verbaende 1934-1945
- History of the Second World War (Part 3): The Germans Strike North
- Just James: The Brother of Jesus in History and Tradition (Studies on Personalities of the New Testament)
Additional info for State Arts Agencies in Search of Themselves, 1965-2003
Example text
6 By the end of the 1980s, SAAs had at least two main political tasks to accomplish: Convince average citizens that the arts are important to their lives, and convince them that their SAA is important to the arts. 5 This desire to reach out beyond their traditional grantee base was not just a response to a political imperative. It was also a recognition of the exciting, highly pluralistic nature of the arts activities taking place around them. 6 Opinions on the effectiveness of state arts advocacy efforts vary widely.
In 1992, the budget of the new, combined council, the MCC, was lower than the sum of the two original 2 In 1973, Congress set the NEA pass-through of program funds to the states at 20 percent. 5 percent reserved for competitive grants in support of rural and inner-city programs. The proportion dedicated to the states was raised again in 1996, to 40 percent. DiMaggio (1991) discusses the possible programmatic impacts of the devolution of arts funding from the federal to the state and local levels.
6 Many more had pursued less-dramatic strategies to achieve populist goals, such as allocating more resources to arts education, folk arts and crafts, the art of cultural minorities, and community-based artists and artistic activities. All of these programs had the additional objective of building a broader political base of support for state arts funding. But although most SAAs greatly expanded their definition of who or what constituted an “arts provider,” no SAA tampered with its basic self-view as a grantmaker, and most retained their emphasis on increasing arts production rather than consumption.