By Paul D. Schumaker, Burdett A. Loomis
"Choosing a President" evaluates the Electoral collage method and 6 valid choices to it. A crew of 37 political scientists think of the basic questions that visit the center of the controversy. at the foundation of those deliberations, each one contributor shows the level to which she or he helps or opposes the Electoral collage and its possible choices. This name positive factors: dialogue on how the Electoral university used to be created, advanced, and presently works, supplying basic ancient and political wisdom; and a scientific account of present possible choices to the Electoral collage delivering 3 reforms and 3 attainable replacements. It demonstrates modes of political research: comparing associations and reforms in keeping with their logical consistency with wanted standards, and comparing associations and reforms in accordance with their (likely) outcomes and implications. It is helping enhance scholars' knowing of political research.
Read Online or Download Choosing a President: The Electoral College and Beyond PDF
Similar elections books
The 2000 Presidential election led to a collision of historical past, legislation, and the courts. It produced a impasse that dragged out the outcome for over a month, and consequences--real and imagined--that promise to tug on for years. within the first in-depth examine of the election and its litigious aftermath, pass judgement on Posner surveys the historical past and conception of yankee electoral legislation and perform, analyzes which Presidential candidate ''really'' gained the preferred vote in Florida, surveys the litigation that ensued, evaluates the courts, the legal professionals, and the commentators, and ends with a blueprint for reforming our Presidential electoral practices.
Examines the careers of 4 presidents and explores the ways that the political process is altering their position.
This present day, electoral authoritarianism represents the commonest kind of political regime within the constructing global - and the only we all know least approximately. Filling within the lacuna, this new publication provides state of the art learn at the inner dynamics of electoral authoritarian regimes. every one concise, jargon-free bankruptcy addresses a selected empirical puzzle at the foundation of cautious cross-national comparability.
AT STAKE: the way forward for AMERICAThe 2016 election is actually America's Armageddon—the final and decisive conflict to avoid wasting the US, a struggle to defeat Hillary Clinton and the forces trying to flout our constitutional executive and change it with an omnipotent president sponsored up by way of an activist judiciary that solutions to not anyone.
Extra info for Choosing a President: The Electoral College and Beyond
Those who previously had written on the College were evenly divided in their attitudes about it. 4. Only six of our participants indicated that they were “ﬁrmly committed” to their position on the Electoral College prior to their involvement in the project. 5. Approval voting allows people to support more than one alternative. Thus, many participants said through their ballots that they could support either the existing system, some modiﬁcation of it, or replacing it with some form of national popular vote.
31 Perhaps a utilitarian analysis here would show that the reform or abolition of the Electoral College is an important next step in our progression toward a more democratic political system. But Mill’s son, John Stuart, understood that utilitarianism could never permit a precise calculation of whether 22 choosing a president the consequences of reform enhanced or reduced overall utility. 32 Because an (electoral) reform may have some consequences that seem desirable, other consequences that seem undesirable, and still other consequences that provoke different judgments among people holding different values, utilitarian analysis is not likely to produce a consensus that such a reform serves the public welfare.
Serial No. 87, 37–40. James Mill, Essay on Government (1820). John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (1863). For a concise contemporary discussion of utilitarianism, see Will Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy (New York: Oxford Press, 1990), 9–49. Benjamin Barber, Strong Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983), 139. Judith Best, testimony at hearing on “Proposals for Electoral College Reform,” before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee of the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 4 September 1997.